WebWord.com > Newsletter Archive > WebWord.com Newsletter Issue #55 |
ISSUE #55 ==================================================
WebWord.com Newsletter
"Industrial Strength Usability"
==================================================
Newsletter Editor
John S. Rhodes
John@webword.com
..................................................
March 4, 2001 Newsletter #55
..................................................
Table of Contents
1. Editorial: There are No Good or Bad Web Sites
2. Analyzing Success Rates in Web Usability Testing:
The Cochran's Q Test
3. The Usability of Email Subject Lines
4. Usability at Women.com - Part II
5. What Stinks About Computer Products?
6. Colorblindness and Usability
7. Visiting The Ghost
8. How often do you visit WebWord?
9. WebWord.com Newsletter Archive
10. What Can You Find at WebWord.com?
3680 subscribers
Tell a friend. Pass this along to a
colleague. We will never sell your
email address. We respect your privacy.
It is easy to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--> http://webword.com/subscriptions.html
Usability Testing Services --> http://webword.com/services/index.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #1 Editorial: There are No Good or Bad Web Sites I've been thinking about books, paper, and the web. What I've noticed is that I still really like books. I appreciate them. They are easy to carry around for the most part, I can mark them up, and they are easy to reference. I also like knowing that almost every technical book has a table of contents and an index. The similar interface from book to book is very pleasing. It also means speed, which is always important. Holding a good book, perhaps in bed or in a chair, is convenient. I still like books even though I use computers constantly. Interestingly, I don't care much for magazines. What I mean is that I don't keep magazines around any more, nor do I buy them. They tend to be expensive and they are a hassle to keep around. Part of the reason is that they "expire" after a short amount of time. This is especially true for technical magazines. So, it isn't that I like or dislike paper. Instead, I like what paper can offer in very specific instances. This is an important point. I like books not because they are made of paper but because they offer certain characteristics that I appreciate. If I simply liked books *because* they were paper, then I should like magazines. But, I don't. When we talk about web usability, we might feel like we should talk about technology, such as HTML, Flash, XML, Cold Fusion, and so forth. Yet, we should be talking about the result of the technology and how humans interact with it. Think again about my paper comments. Paper itself is only used to build the book. It is necessary but not sufficient to satisfy me. In the same sense, it is non-sensical that I should like HTML itself, or even a web site itself. Instead, I should like what the HTML or the web site can do for me. That is why Flash is not evil in any absolute sense. It might be used to produce something that I like or hate. It all depends on how it satisfies my wants and needs. Key point: No technology is inherently good or evil, it entirely depends on how it is applied and how it impacts the people using it. Analogy to the key point: Dumping toxic waste into a river is not inherently good or evil. Humans think that it is nasty and wicked because it kills living things and, in general, humans don't like killing. Note that if all life died on the planet, the Earth would still travel around the sun and time would still pass. I'm not saying that I like toxic dumping. Don't turn my words around! I'm only saying that the action is just an action and it has no value. The impact of the action can be evil because humans *judge* actions as good or evil. Therefore, when talking about web usability, the conversation should almost always be about how humans interact with it. The conversation should not focus on the technology. We need to be interested in outcomes and results and interactions. Don't listen to the experts; there are no inherently good or bad web sites! Cheers, - John John S. Rhodes WebWord.com -- Industrial Strength Usability http://webword.com john@webword.com 607-427-WORD (9673) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #2 A new WebWord.com interview is now online: --> http://webword.com/moving/cochransq.html "Analyzing Success Rates in Web Usability Testing: The Cochran's Q Test" The Cochran's Q Test can be used to statistically analyze success rate data. It can be used even when only a small number of users are tested. This provides some indication that a vast amount of usability data can, and should be statistically analyzed. You can read the new article here: --> http://webword.com/moving/cochransq.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #3 A new WebWord.com report is now online: --> http://webword.com/moving/subjectlines.html "The Usability of Email Subject Lines" Email is very important to a lot of people and companies. However, very little usability research has been done on email, specifically email subject lines. This article is a summary of a research report written by WebWord on the topic and contains several results. The basic finding from the research is that effective email subject lines are very short, very meaningful, and personal. Interesting note: Based on data from 1999, over 394 billion email messages were sent. If the usability of each email was improved to yield (or save) just $0.01, the impact would be almost four billion dollars. I think that is amazing! Special note: At the end of the article you will find a link to download the full report. It is six pages long and full of interesting details. It is totally free. Pass it along to a friend. You can read the new article here: --> http://webword.com/moving/subjectlines.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #4 A new WebWord.com interview is now online: --> http://webword.com/interviews/skeet2.html "Usability at Women.com - Part II" This is a quick follow up to an interview I conducted with Bill Skeet of Women.com near the end of January. Here are some of the questions asked in Part II: * What kinds of usability tests do you do? What were the results? What did you find? * How do you measure the ROI on the usability testing you are doing? * Do you have any interesting case studies? Horror stories? Pitfalls to avoid? Note: I did this interview because of some reader feedback. I always appreciate what you have to say, good or bad. You can read the new interview here: --> http://webword.com/interviews/skeet2.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #5 A new WebWord.com interview is now online: --> http://webword.com/interviews/horowitz.html "What Stinks About Computer Products?" This is an interview I conducted with Michael Horowitz of ComputerGripes.com. Here are some of the questions I asked: * What are the biggest problems you see with technology? Do you see the same types of problems over and over? * How can programmers and designers prevent the kinds of problems that you discuss on Computer Gripes? * Be honest, what companies cause the most pain for people? Check it out! You can read the new interview here: --> http://webword.com/interviews/horowitz.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #6 A new WebWord.com guest article is now online: --> http://webword.com/moving/colorblindness.html "Colorblindness and Usability" You might do a lot of usability testing on your web site but you still might lose up to 10% of your audience because of some simple mistakes with colors. Specifically, your web site may be designed in a way that doesn't work well for people with colorblindness. Generally the fix is quite simple: be sure to provide excellent contrast between your various web page elements. This is a good guest article by Todd Follansbee. He has over 20 years experience in marketing and sales both online and off. He currently works in web development and marketing for TheDay.com. You can read the article here: --> http://webword.com/moving/colorblindness.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #7 A new WebWord.com guest article is now online: --> http://evolt.org/article/Visiting_The_Ghost/25/4572/index.html "Visiting The Ghost" This is a follow up article to my article on The Ghost! I spell out several more ideas and I provide a few more examples for people to think about. I decided to post the article on Evolt.org, to expose more people to the idea. I really like the comments at the end of the article. You can read the article here: --> http://evolt.org/article/Visiting_The_Ghost/25/4572/index.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #8 How often do you visit WebWord? Take the poll: --> http://tools.arsdigita.com/voxpopuli/ViewPoll?poll_id=3047 Thanks you! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #9 WebWord.com Newsletter Archive I have (finally) updated the Newsletter Archive. I have all of the newsletters posted online, in case you missed a previous issue. Enjoy pawing through the old issues... http://webword.com/archive/index.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ITEM #10 What Can You Find at WebWord.com? WebWord.com Services >> http://webword.com/services/index.html Articles (Moving WebWord) >> http://webword.com/moving/ Expert Interviews >> http://webword.com/interviews/ Recommended Books >> http://webword.com/books/booksindex.html Newsletter Archive >> http://webword.com/archive Weblog Archive >> http://www.webword.com/weblog Usability Reports >> http://webword.com/reports Recommended Web Sites >> http://webword.com/hotsites.html ----- End of WebWord.com Usability Newsletter #55 ------ (c)2001 by WebWord.com and John S. Rhodes. All rights reserved. Go Back to the WebWord.com Newsletter Archive |
Home | Moving WebWord | Cool Books |
Hot Web Sites
Services | Weblog
| Interviews
| About
WebWord.com
Subscribe to Webword.com |
Contact John S. Rhodes, the WebWord.com Editor and Webmaster
URL: http://www.WebWord.com/archive/issue055.html
© 2001 by WebWord.com. All rights
reserved.
Do not reproduce or redistribute any material from this document,
in whole or in part, without explicit written permission from John S. Rhodes.