|
WebWord Weblog Posting Posting Date: March 23, 2003 WebWord Comment -- Someone told me this was sexy. Note: Not "sexy" like sexual intercourse but "sexy" like cool and interesting. Wink, wink.
Reader Comments...
I hate to say it, but he should have launched his site into a new window. If he's not going to use a fluid layout, he's prone to making incorrect assumptions about my window width. If I have to fiddle with basic browser controls to correctly view a web page, I question the mindset behind the company or designer. Posted by: Teddy Ruxpin on March 24, 2003 12:31 AM
no, indeed, it's not too sexy. A little sleek, but definitely not sexy. Yeah. Jelly letters? Sexy? Hmmph. Posted by: Alex Volkow on March 24, 2003 11:00 AM
So I hit the link, watch for a bit, and hit the back button to get out. No joy. Hit it again & more.... can't get back to where I was. What's "usable" about that? Sites that capture your browser window and won't give it back suck. Posted by: mcw on March 24, 2003 11:29 AM
Sites that capture your browser window and won't give it back suck. I agree!! Posted by: John S. Rhodes on March 24, 2003 12:56 PM
Phase 1: Capture browser windows.
I don't understand. It doesn't capture my Netscape 7. Buttons are pretty annoying. Posted by: John Bedard on March 24, 2003 01:55 PM
not sexy, not really cool - flash is a form of time robbery and in terms of usability it's a paradigm disruption. Posted by: Gerald on March 24, 2003 08:09 PM
... and I find 433K to be distiurbing ! http://www.eden-designs.com/phobia/mottephobia.html Pfffft ! Posted by: Caleb Carr on March 24, 2003 09:31 PM
Why was the thumping love button splash screen not linked to? Posted by: Cupid on March 25, 2003 12:16 AM
Home | Moving WebWord | Cool Books | Hot Web Sites
URL: http://webword.com/weblog/ ©1998-2005 by WebWord.com. All rights reserved. |